For an introduction to the Sew Your Kibbe Series, please see this post. The posts in this series are intended to be a well researched and thorough investigation of the Kibbe style recommendations, along with several example patterns for each “level of dress.” The posts in this series will be picture heavy and quite lengthy. You may want some tea.
Introduction
So far we have covered Kibbe’s Dramatic, Romantic, and Classic categories. While Dramatic and Romantic represent the extremes of the spectrum, and Classic a complete blending, Gamine is a category that consists of a mixture of opposites. The Gamine will have a mix of distinct yin and yang features, resulting in a random combination of rounded and linear shapes. Kibbe’s Gamine is described as “Piquant Chic.” You can read more about Kibbe’s Gamine here.
Body Type Characteristics
The following are Kibbe’s descriptions of a Gamine Body Type:
GAMINE PHYSICAL PROFILE
NOTE: The following information should be taken as a broad outline of what makes a Gamine. It is the overall combination of a combination of opposites on the Yin/Yang scale (sharply delicate physicality along with a fresh and spicy essence) that creates this Image Identity category. Therefore, slight deviation here or there is always possible and should not be worried over if it does not upset your Yin/Yang balance. Height: 5 feet 5 inches and under. Bone Structure: Angular. Sharp. Narrow – sometimes described as delicate. Square or tapered shoulders (tend to narrowness, as opposed to broad). Delicately sharp facial contours (nose, jaw, cheekbones). Hands and feet are moderate to small, and tend to narrowness. Arms and legs tend to be long. Body type: Straight. Lithe and lean, tends toward sinewy musculature. Tends toward flatness in bust and hips (unless overweight). May be very leggy (coltish). Possibility of being slightly short-waisted. Facial features: Large eyes. Moderate to thin lips (narrow or straight, as opposed to full). Taut cheeks and flesh. Hair: Any type is possible but frequently hair is fine and silky. Coloring: Any coloring is possible (warm or cool), but Gamines are usually distinct or vivid in coloration. Moderate-to-high-contrast coloring is often the case). If overweight: Excess weight tends to show up in the hip and waist areas:rarely does it appear above the waist. If a Gamine is extremely overweight, the body tends to square or stocky appearance, as opposed to curves. A Gamine will not:
Be over 5 feet 5 inches (and is usually even more petite).
Have extremely large bone structure. Have prominent or exotic features (except for enormous eyes).
Have large hands and feet.
Have an hourglass figure, with a waspish waist and full bust and hips.
Be symmetrical in body type or facial features.
Recommendations:
The following are Kibbe’s recommendations regarding the clothing and style choices that best suit his Gamine image ID. The following recommendations will be taken into consideration for each garment type listed below:
SHAPE: Small, sharp, geometrics. Precision fitted and crisply tailored. (The small size and precision fit come from the Yin; the sharp edges and crisp tailoring come from the Yang.)
Avoid: Oversized, large, or long geometrics. Unconstructed shapes. Soft-edged, flowing, or rounded shapes. Ornate, intricate, or delicate shapes.
LINE AND SILHOUETTE: Your outline should be sharp, straight, and staccato. The use of severe lines with sharp edges comes from the Yang; the broken, staccato, animated outline comes from the Yin. Utilizing many short vertical lines and many short horizontal lines is also effective. An overabundance of detail adds to the precisely fitted silhouette that is crucial to your look.
FABRIC: Fabric must always be crisp, able to hold a defined shapes and be tailored easily. A flat surface or light texture is best. Finely woven knits, especially when ribbed and skinny, are good choices. A matte finish is best, although hard-finished sheens can be very exciting (especially metallics). Usually your fabric will be of moderate weight, though lighter weights that hug the body are excellent.
DETAIL: You can never wear too much detail! An abundance of it used everywhere in your look is one of the most effective tools you have for capturing your animated effervescence! Detail should always be small, sharp, and call attention to itself (not blend into the lines of your garments). It should be very crisp, staccato, broken-up, and multicolored. Lots of crisp trim. Lots of outlining (collars, cuffs, waist-bands, lapels) with piping of contrasting colors or fabric, braiding, beads, etc. Small, crisp pleats. Sharp, angular necklines-also small (Mandarin, Nehru, band, small man-tailored styles, small V’s, wing-tipped). Small, tailored lapels or crisp lapel-less with piping. Sharp shoulder pads. Small crisp cuffs. Sharp and narrow waist definition.
Avoid: Minimal, clean detail. Simplicity. Oversized or unconstructed detail. Elongated detail. Ornate or frill detail.
SEPARATES: A use of well-coordinated separates with lots of animated and colorful detail can be very exciting to your look.
COLOR: Your use of color should be bold and sassy; break all the rules here! Multicolored splashes are perfect. Bright and shockingly colored accessories played against a dark or light background. High, sharp contrast and wild color combinations are all very chic on you. Break your line with color!
Avoid: Monochromatic color schemes (death to your personality–nothing is worse for you). Neutrals, unless they are merely accessories or they are extremely dark or light.
PRINTS: Prints should be sharp, colorful, and animated. Small geometrics and angular asymmetrics are excellent. Most of your prints should be very contemporary in feeling (“Picasso-ish”) although humorous styles that are outlined and caricatured can be quite stunning on you as well.
ACCESSORIES All accessories should be small, crisp, geometric, and colorful. They should serve to further break the silhouette into a staccato outline and call attention to themselves as detail. Contrast is being strived for with your use of accessories, as well as bringing out your wit and a sense of fun.
Shoes: Should be tailored and angular, in lightweight leather. Unusual shapes in toes and heels are excellent (asymmetrics, toes and heels are excellent (asymmetrics, wedges, sharp points, etc) as are bold colors and printed fabric. Flats of all kinds should always be funky and fun (patent leather, trimmed, etc.).
Avoid: Plain pumps. Overly delicate or strappy shoes.
Avoid: Oversized, unconstructed pouches. Ornate bags. Thick, heavy briefcases.
Belts: Stiff leather with geometric buckles. Elasticized fabric styles. May be narrow to moderately wide. Brightly colored belts are excellent aids in breaking your line.
Avoid: Oversized, unconstructed, and floppy styles. Ornate styles.
Hosiery: Break your line by contrasting your stocking/hemline/shoe shades. You can use a two-color combination where the shoe and hemline match but the stocking is lighter; or a three-color contrast. Brightly colored stockings; light, opaque stockings; and geometric textures (ribbed and herringbones) are equally good. Flesh toned stockings are fine for daytime wear. Dark stockings should be extremely sheer.
Avoid: One long line of solid color, especially if dark.
Jewelry: Should be small and sharp and in geometric, asymmetrical, or irregular shapes. Brightly colored enamel, stone, or glass are best. Very contemporary avant-garde pieces are excellent on you, as are trendy pieces that accentuate your wit.
For the individual garment types, obviously, I will be focusing on the lines of the garment, as fabric and color choices would easily be controlled by the home sewer. It’s nice that he included a long list of acceptable fabrics though!
Jackets: Short, cropped, very fitted with sharp edges and extreme tailoring and construction. Short blouson jackets are excellent. Collar, cuff, lapel, and waistband detail (outlining, trim, piping, ribbing) are essential.
Avoid: Long jackets. Unconstructed jackets. Flouncy jackets.
Coats – Level 1: Coat options are a bit tough for Gamine – the idea of a cropped style isn’t super conducive with the idea of warmth in extreme weather, but I think by focusing on coats with lots of detail or extreme tailoring it can still for a Gamine.
Coats – Level 2: This is quite a mixed bag; there are options that would not be out of place in a corporate office, and others that that would only make sense at a fun dinner party. Gamine recommendations are a bit all over the place (because Gamine is a combination of opposites), and these examples reflect that.
Coats – Level 3: I didn’t find many examples, but I think formal coats are a bit tricky for Gamine due to the cropped nature and staccato lines Kibbe recommends. Having a simple coat style just means having more opportunity to add embellishment though (either with trim or jewelry).
Jackets – Level 1: I think the type of detail can really help place a Gamine pattern into a Level – most of my Level 1 choices have some sort of exaggerated detail that makes the style feel more casual, whereas later patterns have more sophisticated embellishments. As with many of Kibbe’s Gamine recommendations, they tend towards opposites (“extreme tailoring” vs. “blouson” jackets for example), and this is reflected in my choices. It makes sense though; as Gamines are a combination of opposites, so are their clothing recommendations.
Jackets – Level 2: The second level of dress is for items that could be worn to the office or or an event that requires some dressing up. Gamines can control this to some extent with fabric choice, but more so with the way details are utilized.
Jackets – Level 3: Any sort of bolero style in a fancy, crisp fabric works well for evening, and pairs great with a dress. You can read more about evening jackets in the “Evening” section near the end of the post.
Skirts: Straight, sharp, and short with a narrow and tapered hemline.. A slightly flare skirt is fine if it is kept very straight through the hips and thighs. This could either be bias-cut or stitched-down pleats. Skirts must be very fitted at the waistband. Crisp gathers will work, but not deep ones. Straight skirts should have a short hemline (mid kneecap to minis). A slightly flared hemline may be slightly longer (top of the calf). Anything extremely long is very tricky, and must have a slit and be pencil slim.
Avoid: Full skirts. Flouncy skirts. Over-sized or unconstructed skirts. A-lines and symmetrical skirts. Long hemlines (dowdy on you).
Level 1: For skirts we will see that they type of embellishment really informs the level of dress.
Level 2: In Level 2 we will see styles that more closely follow the primary recommendations, which are to be straight, sharp, short, narrow, and tapered.
Level 3: My choices for Level 3 tend to be more plain in style, but still follow the Gamine guidelines for silhouette and line. This really allows for playing with fun fabrics and mixing separates to create an formal Gamine look.
Pants: Should always be very sharply tailored with outlined or animated detail at the edges (waistbands, pleats, crisp cuffs). Short lengths, anywhere from cropped at the calf to the top of the ankle. Skin tight stretchy pants are excellent.
Avoid: Plain-front, symmetrical shapes. Unconstructed or baggy styles. Draped styles with tapered legs.
Level 1: In which we look at all of the capri styles since the dawn of time. Ok, not really, but I really focused on Kibbe’s recommendation of short lengths, tight fit, and animated detail.
Level 2: While cropped, Level 2 styles don’t read as much “beachy capri” and more “cropped suit trouser.” This level also seems to add additional perky detail to Gamine-ify the styles.
Level 3: Not a lot of Level 3 styles; honestly, most of the Level 2 styles could work at a more elevated level in the right fabric choice and paired with the right jacket.
Blouses: Very tailored with sharp edges and crisp detail (collars, cuffs, pleats, etc.). Smooth, stiff fabrics (crisp cottons, oriental silks, etc.).
Level 1: To make Gamine more casual, the types of details and can really help a garment give a certain impression.
Level 2: The Level 2 Gamine styles are an interesting mix of fun going out looks and more office appropriate styles. Because the Gamine look consists so much of separates, I would argue that it may be more important for a Gamine to focus on appropriate jackets, skirts, and trousers because they will dominate the look, whereas a blouse is really more of a layered coordinating piece, so I really tried to focus on stand-out tops here, rather than pulling out every tailored button down from the stash. We’ve already seen many tailored blouses in the Dramatic and Classic categories, and Gamines can probably borrow quite easily from some of those patterns for Level 2 tops. As long as the tailoring is quite close and crisp and the pattern is made in a smooth fabric it should work. Gamines can also likely take a Classic styles that could be a bit too simple on them and utilize a bold print to satisfy that need for detail and interest.
Level 3: Not a lot of options for Level 3 tops, but I think most Level 3 Gamine looks will utilize jackets to create the formal look, so many of the Level 2 styles (or even snagging a supporting piece from our Classic friends) might not be such a bad idea should the Gamine choose to wear separates.
Sweaters: Skinny knits, ribbed knits. “Poor-boy” styles. Thick knits that are extremely fitted at the waist. Collar, cuff and waistband ribbing and cropping. Short, cropped cardigans. You may wish to add sharp shoulder pads to your sweaters.
Avoid: Oversized sweaters, heavy textures. Fluffy knits.
Level 1: Sweaters were a bit tricks for the Gamine, especially since the trend has been very oversized and slouchy lately. I rounded up what I could, but I’m sad to say these recommendations are a bit sparse.
Level 2: I found a few sweaters that could work at Level 2, but, honestly, it is going to be so much easier for a Gamine to find a jacket because of the need for the crisp, clean tailoring.
Level 3: I wasn’t able to find any Level 3 Sweaters. As with Dramatics, I think the need for extreme tailoring restricts evening choices to jackets, though Gamines can play much more with boleros and other styles that were not part of the Dramatic recommendations.
Dresses: Very tailored, slim dresses with sharp edges and lots of small crisp detail. Drop[ed waists and chemise-style are good if they are kept very skinny. Short cropped jackets, vests, and boleros work well with dresses for you. Asymmetrical hemlines are fun, especially for the evening, and anything reminiscent of the 1920s is an absolute knockout on you! Narrow, clingy knit dresses are excellent.
Avoid: Flouncy styles. Ornate styles (with shirring or draping.) Plain styles with no detail. Unconstructed or wide silhouette.
Level 1: Reading Kibbe’s recommendations, I find the Gamine dress styles to be a bit all over the map! Somehow when I picture “tailored and slim” the “1920s” doesn’t immediately pop into my mind, so there are lots of options here.
Level 2: Many of the Level 1 styles could arguably work in Level 2 as well, so I tried to focus on more traditionally tailored looks for this round.
Level 3: There are some fun looks for Gamines at Level 3, though I veered more towards Kibbe’s skinny chemise-styles here than I did with levels 1 or 2.
Evening Wear: Sleek slinky shapes with geometric outlines and crisp trim. Smooth fabric. Tailored edges. Beading. Hard metallics. Angular necklines with lots of crisp and colorful trimmings (collars, cuffs, jackets, etc.) Asymmetrical hemlines.
Slinky sheaths (very bare). Short-jacketed gowns with beading and crisp shoulders. Close-fitting, dropped-waisted dresses. Tailored dinner suits (with cropped jackets and crisp trim). Tailored evening pants outfits.
Evening is typically an extension of the Level 3 Dresses, but Gamines also have options with dinner suits. I included options that would meet that recommendation in the Level 3 jackets and Level 3 trousers/skirts, so I’m basically focusing on formal event gowns here.
And with that we have our fourth Style ID done! According to Style Syntax, Gamines most easily fit into Level 1 clothes because their look is “fun,” yet I felt I had a much better selection of Level 2 options. I also found that because the Gamine recommendations are so varied, especially in the dress category, that certain styles definitely came across as more or less fancy, and that fabric choice wouldn’t change that feeling as much as it would for a Classic for example. I also think it is interesting to note the ways in which Gamines share traits with Dramatics and/or Romantics. Because they are a mix of opposites, so are their clothes. They get a sharpness from the Dramatic, and a delicate petiteness from the Romantic. Like Classics, there is a fair bit of tailoring and structure involved, though with Gamines we see much more detail and a broken visual line. In contrast, Classics get the continuous vertical like from their Dramatic component, and a less severe shape from the Romantic. Because the tailoring aspect is quite important for Dramatic, Classic, and Gamine, it actually means there could be a fair bit of overlap of pattern options in some categories, like blouses. I think the distinctions are more clear in the other categories, especially with regards to hem length, which is quite distinct between the three categories.
One thing I often see with “Gamine style” on the internet is the very stereotypical presentation of it being boldly quirky or very twee. While I think these are styles that suit Gamine quite well (and are somewhat overused in film media to highlight the true uniqueness of the manic pixie dream girl), I don’t think it is the only look a Gamine can pull off. From these examples, I think it should be pretty clear that Gamines have a lot of room to play. While Kibbe is definitely against any sort of flowing ruffle that may have been seen with the Romantics, I think a Gamine who is drawn to those styles can play around with the 1920s style dresses to create a softer look. Similarly, the sharp tailoring recommendations make the prospect of creating a “Classic impression” quite achievable while staying well within the actual Gamine guidelines.
I also want to mention the relative difficulty I had in finding Plus patterns to fit in with some of these categories. Trousers and skirts were quite simple to find great examples, but dresses and jackets were much more difficult. As with Classic, I found I skipped over a lot of patterns I found to be “too Soft Gamine” or “too Flamboyant Gamine.” I think it will be quite interesting to see how the recommendations change when we get to the Gamine subtypes especially; with a slight change to the yin/yang balance Gamine looks can be pretty radically different. I also thought it was interesting how randomly Gamine styles would crop up – it’s always some 60s throwback segment of a random Burda that has great patterns, but it isn’t like Dramatic or Romantic that seem to be popular in cycles, or like Classic that has a steady stream of options throughout the years. (Tangentially, if you are a Gamine, the 2014 Fall/Winter Burda Easy magazine really should be in your collection, because I pulled so many great looks from there.)
As a side note, I feel like this is the category that most often gets misclassified, as the combinations of the yin and yang elements can be very random in a person, but I think being able to wear a cropped style is a big hint that Gamine could work for you. For myself, I know that Gamine is my worst Kibbe style – I can’t tell you how many times I’ve tried to wear any of these recommendations in the past, yet there wasn’t a single instance where I didn’t end up feeling entirely self-conscious by the time I’d left the house. Even as a child I felt naked in a mini skirt, and I’ve never been able to convincingly wear a capri pant. This doesn’t mean I don’t like Gamine style (I had so much fun putting together this post and playing with these styles!), it just means I’m self aware enough to know that as a style ID, Gamine really wouldn’t work for me.
But I would like to hear from any Gamines in the audience. How do you feel about these styles? Do you often go for cropped lengths and play with the combinations of contrasting lines and sharp tailoring? Or do you think you will find more things to love when we get to the subtypes? Do we have anyone who isn’t a Gamine but really wants to be? What draws you to the style? What about anyone who is like me, and absolutely knows that Gamine is not their ID, but can still appreciate it in an intellectual way? I’ve been loving everyone’s comments, and I feel like there is a lot to discuss with the Gamine style this week.
Coming Next Week: At this point we’ve seen the pure yang Dramatics, pure yin Romantics, blended yin/yang Classics, and mixed yin/yang Gamines. Next week we will see what happens when, rather than mixing or blending, the addition of yin blunts the sharp yang edges of the Dramatic with the final main type, Kibbe’s Natural!
What great styles, lucky gamines! They get the coolest of the 1960s looks – super short shift dresses and the Audrey Hepburn beatnik style of the late 1050s / early 60s.
Audrey was a Flamboyant Gamine, so she is a great style icon for the Gamine types. 60s style in general does work really well for Gamines; the crisp shapes and cropped silhouettes are perfect for them.
I am 5’3” and usually dress size 38 (tho gone up to 42 since meno). I always thought of gamine as flimsy, floaty, Lolita-like, but your selections include many patterns that I own, so … I may rethink. Thanks for the time you put into all this
I think the typical image of the Lolita style fits much more into the Soft Gamine sub category. Kibbe’s regular Gamine is all about crisp, precise details and not so much about floaty ruffles.
So many great coat and jacket patterns for a start! the cape ones reminded me of the watson by paperut patterns https://papercutpatterns.com/products/watson-jacket. I have had Butterick 6497 jacket on my to sew list for ages but I’m worried I don’t have enough of my wool, maybe the little burda cape would be another good option for me ;o)
I have to admit that I love all the detail in the Gamine styles, especially in the cropped jackets and the tuxedo-style pintucked shirts, but I don’t naturally gravitate to wearing these styles myself. And I too have a love/hate relationship with capri pants… pictures of both Audrey (FG) and Marilyn (R) wearing them make them seem so glamorous in a casual sort of way. I would love to be able to find a pattern that I could wear convincingly, but alas, they all seem to hit at the wrong point of my muscular calves and make me feel stubby rather than chic. So far, I feel closest to the recommendations in the Classic post, but the severe lack of detail is not me, either. And I love a good puffed sleeve, so I know that I’m drawn to some Romantic elements. Looking forward to the recommendations for Naturals.
It sounds like you will definitely fit into one of the soft subtypes (Soft Classic maybe?), but it should be much easier to narrow down after we get Natural up and can compare the 5 main types.
Not a gamine either, not in the least, but I’m shocked at how many of these patterns I own…! 😂 Guess I’ve been trying to dress the wrong way all along. The jacket up top ( a leather one from 02/2010 #130) is a jacket I looooove and WISH I could wear.
Gotta say, I’ve been referring back to the Dramatic post you did, trying to find patterns in that vein. Great job on these posts!
Thanks! I’m glad people are using these posts as a reference tool – I plan to do the same once I finish them all.
As a side note: please don’t give up on patterns that bring you joy! Just because they are in the Gamine post doesn’t mean they won’t work for other styles. The jacket you love has a very sharp collar, so I feel like as part of a monochromatic look a Dramatic could wear it pretty easily. It’s not the “perfect” Dramatic lines, but it’s also not frilly at all. As a casual jacket it could work. I don’t want people to feel like they dress “wrong” by going against the recommendations; I still very much believe people should do what they want. I know I’ve got a few “Gamine” styles I still want to make, regardless of their Gamineness, because I love them. But I do think these guidelines are helpful at narrowing my focus between similar styles. For me this is about understanding what silhouettes I should focus on to make a core wardrobe, not that I could never sew another pattern from a different category. I feel like with a solid base of styles, it will allow experimental silhouettes/styles/etc. to be made without so much pressure for success. It might change the ratios of what I sew (my personal goal in this exercise), but it doesn’t mean I’m totally taking other projects off the list.
They really are helpful… there are patterns in some collections you’ve show that I have tried to make and I don’t wear them finally not just because I’m still learning the skill of sewing, but because the style wasn’t what I thought. I now have at least a better idea. I’m very tall, and some clothes just don’t suit me. (but I will make that jacket… 🙂 )
I’ve also had a fair number of style fails… It’s hard because I feel like I can’t really identify them as fails until long after the pattern review post has gone up, so they often don’t get a second mention on the blog. I love what Gillian did in her “Sewing Kibbe Gamine” post (https://craftingarainbow.wordpress.com/2018/10/18/sewing-kibbe-gamine/), where she basically did side-by-side comparisons of many of her makes to see what worked and what didn’t. I think it’s a great idea, and I sort of want to do a similar post for my own sewn items after I finish more of the series.
Also, yay jacket! I think looking at Kibbe’s general recommendations can be really helpful for styling pieces that don’t fit completely within the other guidelines. If the overall impression is one of “Dramatic” then the look will work. Merriam Style’s YouTube channel had an interesting video about how to borrow elements from other IDs to adjust the feel of your look. I may delve a little into that before I start the subtype posts. But the long and short of it is that if the jacket is *slightly* softer than the full Dramatic recommendations, it will kind of just make you look like a bad ass. 😉
This is really interesting. Although I’m pretty sure I’m a dramatic classic, I do own patterns and wear clothes similar to several of these styles, and I don’t think they look at all bad on me. Some look pretty damn good! I wonder if it’s because although I am 5’7, the extra couple of inches is between my waist and crotch rather than me having a very long legs all a long torso. Perhaps my body is not that different to the game in body…
It strikes me that virtually every passing by Tilly and the buttons would suit this style.
I am going to have to ponder how I can take elements I love from this style and fit them in with dramatic classic.
I think there is a lot of overlap between the styles that could work for Gamine and Dramatic Classic, because of the need for added crispness or sharpness. Picking out details from the Gamine looks can definitely be applied to Dramatic Classic style, you probably just can’t use all of them at the same time the way a Gamine could. For Dramatic Classic it’s going to be more about choosing which detail you want to create a bit more simplicity.
I also think one thing we need to remember is that Kibbe was writing about choosing clothes from RTW – a shorter Gamine and a taller Dramatic Classic aren’t going to be able to easily wear the same pieces because in RTW the scale of size and fit is going to be so far off. But in sewing patterns we can adjust fit and length to make them perfect for ourselves, so it is quite conceivable that multiple Style IDs could use the same pattern quite easily, and still be within their own recommendations.
Also, also, I want to point out that I’m not posting every possible pattern ever that works with a Style ID, or saying it *won’t* work for another ID. I’m trying to find examples that best illustrate the descriptions Kibbe is trying to convey with his words, so we can have a sort of visual vocabulary to work with. I expect as we move to the subtypes we will start to see some overlap of patterns, as well as some new styes that make each ID unique.
Anyway, suffice to say, I think taking elements from Gamine and using them in Dramatic Classic won’t be too hard – you will just have to make sure you don’t put too many elements in one look to retain the Classic-ness of an outfit.
I agree that Tilly and the Buttons is a very gamine designer. I find I just skip over her offerings now, because I’m pretty much guaranteed to not find anything that works for me.
(I’m a soft natural, if that helps/makes a difference). 🙂
I totally understand! I never really “got” why people liked 60s style on a personal level before this – it’s a perfect decade for Gamines, but it looks so awkward on me that I never responded to it myself. My love of 30s/50s/70s makes soooooo much more sense in the context of being Soft Natural. I think this series is really forcing me to find things I like for each of the IDs, but also very much clarify what will and won’t work for me on a personal level. I have to admit there is at least one dress here I’m still planing on making (because I love it!), but most of these patterns live in the folders of computer files I never visit for inspiration.
Your comments about the various decades is another interesting bit to consider. I have often wondered how to classify each of the various decades and the overall silhouettes that were in style at the time within the Kibbe system. It would definitely be useful information for those of us that have a fondness for a slightly vintage look to know which decades to search out in vintage patterns. Probably my most favorite decade is the 40s. I have seen it discussed as being good for those with an hourglass shape, but what I find about it that works so well for me is the broad shoulder cut. Where I find many woven blouse pull at the shoulders, 40s cuts often have ease in that area naturally built in.
40s is interesting because I feel like it works well for so many types. The broad shoulders are a feature for Naturals, but the detail often comes off as Gamine. I’ve seen patterns that could work well for Dramatic and Classics from that era as well. Romantics not so much because the war rations would really limit anything super frothy, but even a few soft details in a design could tip it that way to make it suitable for them.
I’ll consider talking more about this in an upcoming post – very interesting topic!
This one is fascinating! Even though I absolutely adore the Gamine type of beauty, I can’t for the life of me picture how they would follow Kibbe’s rules to get dressed. Having these examples definitely helps illustrate it — and how opposite it can be from the Classic. And I see several of my patterns here that I had already allocated to the “out” pile.
I definitely think having visuals really helps to clarify what he is talking about. Being able to compare and contrast also really helps clarify what makes a style one ID vs another, and should help identify what specific elements would make a pattern “work” or “not work” depending on the look you are trying to achieve.
Definitely not my style, but I really enjoyed reading your analysis. I suspect smaller pattern houses tend to put out styles appropriate to a certain Kibbe ID because it fits their aesthetic. I agree with Anna Jo that Tilly and the Buttons skews Gamine. I’m now trying to categorise a few others! Named strike me as fairly Classic. Not sure about Colette; the original styles are quite Romantic but I’m not super familiar with more recent ones. I could go down this rabbit hole for hours.
I’m totally planning on doing an Indie/Kibbe post after I finish the main series. I agree that the smaller brands tend to skew towards an aesthetic – it’s why I’ve been pulling from the Big 4 and Burda catalogs, since their “style” pulls more from current runway trends and follows major fashion arcs a bit more than a personal aesthetic. Though I think all brands have a bit of that aesthetic skew. (I’ll talk about that next week with Burda and their love affair with Naturals…)
Tangentially, Colette is interesting because I feel like they have enough of a catalog to have expended out of a single ID category. Right now I feel like a lot of their stuff fits in Natural (because that’s what the trends are), but originally I would have said Classic and Gamine. What I will say is that as we wrap up the main types, a common theme is simplicity (except for Gamines, but even the main type has a clean crispness to the look), and I feel like a lot of the indie brands are really going for a minimalist look right now, so would fit in well with a lot of these main type recommendations. It will definitely be an interesting topic to explore more deeply in future!
I always love the creative seaming and lines in this type of clothing but wearing it I always feel like a round peg in a square whole. I also love 20s dresses but can’t wear them without looking like a 2×4. I have a couple of friends I take a ballet class with that would look ‘adorbs’ in these styles. One a gymnast and the other a ballroom teacher. I feel like the hippos next to the ostriches (Fantasia)when we’re in a mirror. The peplum tops and boleros are something I’d wear though and I like shrunken and cropped and peplum jackets (at least the softer shapes). This has helped to see that I’m definitely not Gamine even though I’m short. Looking forward to the subtypes!
I now realise why the makes that really worked did so and why some fails failed. There is so much in gamine that is me. I will be really interested to see sub types to understand how they relate. Thank you so much for doing this series – from 8000 miles away.
This is such a fun series! I’ve long admired the mod 60s type styles, but never felt comfortable in them. I’m right with you on miniskirts making me feel naked! Some of those jackets are super fun, but I’m skeptical of my ability to pull off cropped anything. So when I pull inspiration from the 60s, I tend to go more flowy hippie. I strongly suspect that I’m a soft natural, so I’ll be very interested to read the next post!
Very interesting and well, eye-opening! After answering the kibble questionnaire I was sure I was a soft classic… Then this post! I made many of these patterns, some even twice… But I can’t wear any ’20s style or low waisted garment (made a jacket, big mistake). So I went back to the questionnaire and with some help of an honest friend found out that I may be a soft gamine type… Just for fun here is my muslins for Burda short jacket and skirt you mentioned, hehe! Again your posts on this sujet are so fantastic and inspiring! https://www.burdastyle.com/projects/soft-biker-jacket?all_images=1#project-shot-all
I think it is pretty common to mid-self-diagnose your own Kibbe on the first go. I thought I was a Soft Classic too; I think the “soft” overlay can make it really hard to distinguish the body structure/bone shape underneath.
Thank you for another wonderful Kibbe examination! I absolutely love this series. I am not sure where I really fall in the Kibbe system as I am drawn to elements of the Classic style and elements of the Gamine style. I’m definitely not dramatic (too short at 5’1″), but I’m not a romantic either (ruffles make me retch). The clean lines of the classic are great for me but I’m better with above the knee skirt lengths; however, monochromatic doesn’t work for me at all and suits are way too matchy for me. I love the color blocking and separates of gamine style but can’t wear 20’s styles or capris. Is there a classic/gamine blend? As far as taking the Kibbe test goes, I end up with more D answers than anything else but the rest are C’s and E’s mostly. This series is such a fun way to examine patterns.
You might enjoy Theatrical Romantic, Dramatic Classic, or Flamboyant Gamine when we get to those styles! The D/C/E would hint at Theatrical Romantic but I think it can be hard to self-diagnose with the quiz sometimes.
I’m definitely gamine or flamboyant gamine, I wear cropped jackets and capri pants better than any other styles, and contrasting separates look better than long flowy robes or classic monochrome skirt suits. I’m 5’6″ though and borrow from dramatics occasionally (second best style, just needs more detail to make it work). I know I’m not misidentified, as 2 stylists so far have agreed with me and every other category looks very obviously terrible on me.
People regularly think I’m way younger and shorter than I actually am. My head is quite large for my size and makes me look doll-like, I know that because people actually tell me (while calling me ‘cute’) and also because I have to buy mens’ hats.
Yet, random ppl on the internet announce to me that I can’t possibly be gamine because I’m 1″ taller than a 1980s book says I should be. Lol. I wouldn’t take this too literally, as long as you’re not on either extreme end of the spectrum I think medium height can be pretty much any type.
Anyway, thanks a lot for the pattern collection (anxiously awaiting the subtypes!) 🙂
Thank you so much for this!! I’m bookmarking this for future reference! Was rather long to read even in 1 sitting, which says a lot with the amount of internet reading I do 🙂 I’m consuming all your relevant Kibbe posts – wardrobe planning, Gamine, Flamboyant Gamine and Soft Gamine(?). (I’m unsure which Gamine type I fall into – I have long arms and legs, but fleshy arms, which makes me think I’m a SG)
Not sure I agree with some of the skirt patterns with the flounce, they feel too busy and against the “slim skirt” principle, though they do divide up the body and introduce horizontal lines. Perhaps it’s mainly that it is not exactly my style (though I’ve never tried it on come to think of it…) I admire how much analysis you have put into this – it’s inspired me to take a closer look at applying the principles to sewing patterns, since I’ve had a tendency to jump at whatever looks shiny and nice on the model without analyzing whether it would suit my body.
I do agree that the clothes that suit my body type have NOT been in style for some time now (will look for Burda 2014 at the library) but that is the great thing about sewing is to not be tied to RTW 🙂
Hi! I’ve Just discovered this blog and I’m really fascinated! Please could you guys help me to figure out what type am I? Someone has told me that I’m a gamine type, but still I’m so confused. I’m pretty small- 5’3’’, my bones are slightly delicate, tapered shoulders, the figure I’d compare to the rectangle. I’ve got a proportioned bust waist and hips ( 89-61-88 cm) and I’m pretty short-waisted. Legs seems to be moderately short in proportion to my height. Hands and feet- moderate. Face- slightly small, delicate jawline, symmetrical spaced eses- not too big, not small, soft cheeks, moderate, straight lips. Absolutely no exotic features in face. I feel kind of boyish in small, sharp and crisply tailored clothes. I found it makes my figure too straight and hides my figure. Some people even told me I’ve got no bust, even if I know that’s not true. I have also a delicate hourglass figure- not that full one with a prominent bust and hips, but still noticeable. One more thing- I don’t feel good with so many details- that makes me almost invisible- first you can see that details then me. I’ve checked that during measuring wedding dresses. Too many details, ornamentation and too much shine makes me invisible- I could see only a beautiful dress, not a dress making me look beautiful. Please, let me know what you think. Maybe I am a gamine and it’s just hard to accept rules for that type or maybe I’m not a gamine and that’s why it’s so difficult for me.
What great styles, lucky gamines! They get the coolest of the 1960s looks – super short shift dresses and the Audrey Hepburn beatnik style of the late 1050s / early 60s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Audrey was a Flamboyant Gamine, so she is a great style icon for the Gamine types. 60s style in general does work really well for Gamines; the crisp shapes and cropped silhouettes are perfect for them.
LikeLike
I am 5’3” and usually dress size 38 (tho gone up to 42 since meno). I always thought of gamine as flimsy, floaty, Lolita-like, but your selections include many patterns that I own, so … I may rethink. Thanks for the time you put into all this
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think the typical image of the Lolita style fits much more into the Soft Gamine sub category. Kibbe’s regular Gamine is all about crisp, precise details and not so much about floaty ruffles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So many great coat and jacket patterns for a start! the cape ones reminded me of the watson by paperut patterns https://papercutpatterns.com/products/watson-jacket. I have had Butterick 6497 jacket on my to sew list for ages but I’m worried I don’t have enough of my wool, maybe the little burda cape would be another good option for me ;o)
LikeLiked by 1 person
That Papercut pattern is so perfect! And a mini cape would be so cute.
LikeLike
Yup, I’m definitely NOT Gamine, so I suppose it gives me some hints on what to avoid in styles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m so definitely not Gamine it’s not even funny 😆
LikeLike
I have to admit that I love all the detail in the Gamine styles, especially in the cropped jackets and the tuxedo-style pintucked shirts, but I don’t naturally gravitate to wearing these styles myself. And I too have a love/hate relationship with capri pants… pictures of both Audrey (FG) and Marilyn (R) wearing them make them seem so glamorous in a casual sort of way. I would love to be able to find a pattern that I could wear convincingly, but alas, they all seem to hit at the wrong point of my muscular calves and make me feel stubby rather than chic. So far, I feel closest to the recommendations in the Classic post, but the severe lack of detail is not me, either. And I love a good puffed sleeve, so I know that I’m drawn to some Romantic elements. Looking forward to the recommendations for Naturals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It sounds like you will definitely fit into one of the soft subtypes (Soft Classic maybe?), but it should be much easier to narrow down after we get Natural up and can compare the 5 main types.
LikeLike
Not a gamine either, not in the least, but I’m shocked at how many of these patterns I own…! 😂 Guess I’ve been trying to dress the wrong way all along. The jacket up top ( a leather one from 02/2010 #130) is a jacket I looooove and WISH I could wear.
Gotta say, I’ve been referring back to the Dramatic post you did, trying to find patterns in that vein. Great job on these posts!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! I’m glad people are using these posts as a reference tool – I plan to do the same once I finish them all.
As a side note: please don’t give up on patterns that bring you joy! Just because they are in the Gamine post doesn’t mean they won’t work for other styles. The jacket you love has a very sharp collar, so I feel like as part of a monochromatic look a Dramatic could wear it pretty easily. It’s not the “perfect” Dramatic lines, but it’s also not frilly at all. As a casual jacket it could work. I don’t want people to feel like they dress “wrong” by going against the recommendations; I still very much believe people should do what they want. I know I’ve got a few “Gamine” styles I still want to make, regardless of their Gamineness, because I love them. But I do think these guidelines are helpful at narrowing my focus between similar styles. For me this is about understanding what silhouettes I should focus on to make a core wardrobe, not that I could never sew another pattern from a different category. I feel like with a solid base of styles, it will allow experimental silhouettes/styles/etc. to be made without so much pressure for success. It might change the ratios of what I sew (my personal goal in this exercise), but it doesn’t mean I’m totally taking other projects off the list.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They really are helpful… there are patterns in some collections you’ve show that I have tried to make and I don’t wear them finally not just because I’m still learning the skill of sewing, but because the style wasn’t what I thought. I now have at least a better idea. I’m very tall, and some clothes just don’t suit me. (but I will make that jacket… 🙂 )
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve also had a fair number of style fails… It’s hard because I feel like I can’t really identify them as fails until long after the pattern review post has gone up, so they often don’t get a second mention on the blog. I love what Gillian did in her “Sewing Kibbe Gamine” post (https://craftingarainbow.wordpress.com/2018/10/18/sewing-kibbe-gamine/), where she basically did side-by-side comparisons of many of her makes to see what worked and what didn’t. I think it’s a great idea, and I sort of want to do a similar post for my own sewn items after I finish more of the series.
Also, yay jacket! I think looking at Kibbe’s general recommendations can be really helpful for styling pieces that don’t fit completely within the other guidelines. If the overall impression is one of “Dramatic” then the look will work. Merriam Style’s YouTube channel had an interesting video about how to borrow elements from other IDs to adjust the feel of your look. I may delve a little into that before I start the subtype posts. But the long and short of it is that if the jacket is *slightly* softer than the full Dramatic recommendations, it will kind of just make you look like a bad ass. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is really interesting. Although I’m pretty sure I’m a dramatic classic, I do own patterns and wear clothes similar to several of these styles, and I don’t think they look at all bad on me. Some look pretty damn good! I wonder if it’s because although I am 5’7, the extra couple of inches is between my waist and crotch rather than me having a very long legs all a long torso. Perhaps my body is not that different to the game in body…
It strikes me that virtually every passing by Tilly and the buttons would suit this style.
I am going to have to ponder how I can take elements I love from this style and fit them in with dramatic classic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Stupid phone posted before I had a chance to override the autocorrect errors, but hopefully you can understand me!
LikeLike
I think there is a lot of overlap between the styles that could work for Gamine and Dramatic Classic, because of the need for added crispness or sharpness. Picking out details from the Gamine looks can definitely be applied to Dramatic Classic style, you probably just can’t use all of them at the same time the way a Gamine could. For Dramatic Classic it’s going to be more about choosing which detail you want to create a bit more simplicity.
I also think one thing we need to remember is that Kibbe was writing about choosing clothes from RTW – a shorter Gamine and a taller Dramatic Classic aren’t going to be able to easily wear the same pieces because in RTW the scale of size and fit is going to be so far off. But in sewing patterns we can adjust fit and length to make them perfect for ourselves, so it is quite conceivable that multiple Style IDs could use the same pattern quite easily, and still be within their own recommendations.
Also, also, I want to point out that I’m not posting every possible pattern ever that works with a Style ID, or saying it *won’t* work for another ID. I’m trying to find examples that best illustrate the descriptions Kibbe is trying to convey with his words, so we can have a sort of visual vocabulary to work with. I expect as we move to the subtypes we will start to see some overlap of patterns, as well as some new styes that make each ID unique.
Anyway, suffice to say, I think taking elements from Gamine and using them in Dramatic Classic won’t be too hard – you will just have to make sure you don’t put too many elements in one look to retain the Classic-ness of an outfit.
LikeLike
I agree that Tilly and the Buttons is a very gamine designer. I find I just skip over her offerings now, because I’m pretty much guaranteed to not find anything that works for me.
(I’m a soft natural, if that helps/makes a difference). 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve never bought a TIlly pattern because they just don’t speak to me, likely for the same reason.
LikeLike
Wow. Another type that I am NOT. With no offense intended to anyone who likes these clothes, I hate them all. Even more than the Romantic styles.
Thank you again for all the work you are putting into this series. I am enjoying it tremendously.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I totally understand! I never really “got” why people liked 60s style on a personal level before this – it’s a perfect decade for Gamines, but it looks so awkward on me that I never responded to it myself. My love of 30s/50s/70s makes soooooo much more sense in the context of being Soft Natural. I think this series is really forcing me to find things I like for each of the IDs, but also very much clarify what will and won’t work for me on a personal level. I have to admit there is at least one dress here I’m still planing on making (because I love it!), but most of these patterns live in the folders of computer files I never visit for inspiration.
LikeLike
Your comments about the various decades is another interesting bit to consider. I have often wondered how to classify each of the various decades and the overall silhouettes that were in style at the time within the Kibbe system. It would definitely be useful information for those of us that have a fondness for a slightly vintage look to know which decades to search out in vintage patterns. Probably my most favorite decade is the 40s. I have seen it discussed as being good for those with an hourglass shape, but what I find about it that works so well for me is the broad shoulder cut. Where I find many woven blouse pull at the shoulders, 40s cuts often have ease in that area naturally built in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
40s is interesting because I feel like it works well for so many types. The broad shoulders are a feature for Naturals, but the detail often comes off as Gamine. I’ve seen patterns that could work well for Dramatic and Classics from that era as well. Romantics not so much because the war rations would really limit anything super frothy, but even a few soft details in a design could tip it that way to make it suitable for them.
I’ll consider talking more about this in an upcoming post – very interesting topic!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This one is fascinating! Even though I absolutely adore the Gamine type of beauty, I can’t for the life of me picture how they would follow Kibbe’s rules to get dressed. Having these examples definitely helps illustrate it — and how opposite it can be from the Classic. And I see several of my patterns here that I had already allocated to the “out” pile.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I definitely think having visuals really helps to clarify what he is talking about. Being able to compare and contrast also really helps clarify what makes a style one ID vs another, and should help identify what specific elements would make a pattern “work” or “not work” depending on the look you are trying to achieve.
LikeLike
Definitely not my style, but I really enjoyed reading your analysis. I suspect smaller pattern houses tend to put out styles appropriate to a certain Kibbe ID because it fits their aesthetic. I agree with Anna Jo that Tilly and the Buttons skews Gamine. I’m now trying to categorise a few others! Named strike me as fairly Classic. Not sure about Colette; the original styles are quite Romantic but I’m not super familiar with more recent ones. I could go down this rabbit hole for hours.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oooh, I like this game!
I’d call Paco Peralta (both for Vogue and his independent patterns) Classic. The Tilton sisters seem Natural to me, and so does Sandra Betzina.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m totally planning on doing an Indie/Kibbe post after I finish the main series. I agree that the smaller brands tend to skew towards an aesthetic – it’s why I’ve been pulling from the Big 4 and Burda catalogs, since their “style” pulls more from current runway trends and follows major fashion arcs a bit more than a personal aesthetic. Though I think all brands have a bit of that aesthetic skew. (I’ll talk about that next week with Burda and their love affair with Naturals…)
Tangentially, Colette is interesting because I feel like they have enough of a catalog to have expended out of a single ID category. Right now I feel like a lot of their stuff fits in Natural (because that’s what the trends are), but originally I would have said Classic and Gamine. What I will say is that as we wrap up the main types, a common theme is simplicity (except for Gamines, but even the main type has a clean crispness to the look), and I feel like a lot of the indie brands are really going for a minimalist look right now, so would fit in well with a lot of these main type recommendations. It will definitely be an interesting topic to explore more deeply in future!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always love the creative seaming and lines in this type of clothing but wearing it I always feel like a round peg in a square whole. I also love 20s dresses but can’t wear them without looking like a 2×4. I have a couple of friends I take a ballet class with that would look ‘adorbs’ in these styles. One a gymnast and the other a ballroom teacher. I feel like the hippos next to the ostriches (Fantasia)when we’re in a mirror. The peplum tops and boleros are something I’d wear though and I like shrunken and cropped and peplum jackets (at least the softer shapes). This has helped to see that I’m definitely not Gamine even though I’m short. Looking forward to the subtypes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can totally relate to the hippo/ostrich thing – feels like the entirety of my time in skating!
LikeLike
Hahaaha… 🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
I now realise why the makes that really worked did so and why some fails failed. There is so much in gamine that is me. I will be really interested to see sub types to understand how they relate. Thank you so much for doing this series – from 8000 miles away.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome! I’m excited to get to the subtypes – there is so much more specific detail there that’s going to be fun to play with.
LikeLike
This is such a fun series! I’ve long admired the mod 60s type styles, but never felt comfortable in them. I’m right with you on miniskirts making me feel naked! Some of those jackets are super fun, but I’m skeptical of my ability to pull off cropped anything. So when I pull inspiration from the 60s, I tend to go more flowy hippie. I strongly suspect that I’m a soft natural, so I’ll be very interested to read the next post!
LikeLike
Very interesting and well, eye-opening! After answering the kibble questionnaire I was sure I was a soft classic… Then this post! I made many of these patterns, some even twice… But I can’t wear any ’20s style or low waisted garment (made a jacket, big mistake). So I went back to the questionnaire and with some help of an honest friend found out that I may be a soft gamine type… Just for fun here is my muslins for Burda short jacket and skirt you mentioned, hehe! Again your posts on this sujet are so fantastic and inspiring!
https://www.burdastyle.com/projects/soft-biker-jacket?all_images=1#project-shot-all
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it is pretty common to mid-self-diagnose your own Kibbe on the first go. I thought I was a Soft Classic too; I think the “soft” overlay can make it really hard to distinguish the body structure/bone shape underneath.
Thanks for sharing your WIP!
LikeLike
Thank you for another wonderful Kibbe examination! I absolutely love this series. I am not sure where I really fall in the Kibbe system as I am drawn to elements of the Classic style and elements of the Gamine style. I’m definitely not dramatic (too short at 5’1″), but I’m not a romantic either (ruffles make me retch). The clean lines of the classic are great for me but I’m better with above the knee skirt lengths; however, monochromatic doesn’t work for me at all and suits are way too matchy for me. I love the color blocking and separates of gamine style but can’t wear 20’s styles or capris. Is there a classic/gamine blend? As far as taking the Kibbe test goes, I end up with more D answers than anything else but the rest are C’s and E’s mostly. This series is such a fun way to examine patterns.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You might enjoy Theatrical Romantic, Dramatic Classic, or Flamboyant Gamine when we get to those styles! The D/C/E would hint at Theatrical Romantic but I think it can be hard to self-diagnose with the quiz sometimes.
LikeLike
I’m definitely gamine or flamboyant gamine, I wear cropped jackets and capri pants better than any other styles, and contrasting separates look better than long flowy robes or classic monochrome skirt suits. I’m 5’6″ though and borrow from dramatics occasionally (second best style, just needs more detail to make it work). I know I’m not misidentified, as 2 stylists so far have agreed with me and every other category looks very obviously terrible on me.
People regularly think I’m way younger and shorter than I actually am. My head is quite large for my size and makes me look doll-like, I know that because people actually tell me (while calling me ‘cute’) and also because I have to buy mens’ hats.
Yet, random ppl on the internet announce to me that I can’t possibly be gamine because I’m 1″ taller than a 1980s book says I should be. Lol. I wouldn’t take this too literally, as long as you’re not on either extreme end of the spectrum I think medium height can be pretty much any type.
Anyway, thanks a lot for the pattern collection (anxiously awaiting the subtypes!) 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent point. I think that’s why it’s so hard to use height as a determining factor when you are in that middle/average territory.
LikeLike
Thank you so much for this!! I’m bookmarking this for future reference! Was rather long to read even in 1 sitting, which says a lot with the amount of internet reading I do 🙂 I’m consuming all your relevant Kibbe posts – wardrobe planning, Gamine, Flamboyant Gamine and Soft Gamine(?). (I’m unsure which Gamine type I fall into – I have long arms and legs, but fleshy arms, which makes me think I’m a SG)
Not sure I agree with some of the skirt patterns with the flounce, they feel too busy and against the “slim skirt” principle, though they do divide up the body and introduce horizontal lines. Perhaps it’s mainly that it is not exactly my style (though I’ve never tried it on come to think of it…) I admire how much analysis you have put into this – it’s inspired me to take a closer look at applying the principles to sewing patterns, since I’ve had a tendency to jump at whatever looks shiny and nice on the model without analyzing whether it would suit my body.
I do agree that the clothes that suit my body type have NOT been in style for some time now (will look for Burda 2014 at the library) but that is the great thing about sewing is to not be tied to RTW 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi! I’ve Just discovered this blog and I’m really fascinated! Please could you guys help me to figure out what type am I? Someone has told me that I’m a gamine type, but still I’m so confused. I’m pretty small- 5’3’’, my bones are slightly delicate, tapered shoulders, the figure I’d compare to the rectangle. I’ve got a proportioned bust waist and hips ( 89-61-88 cm) and I’m pretty short-waisted. Legs seems to be moderately short in proportion to my height. Hands and feet- moderate. Face- slightly small, delicate jawline, symmetrical spaced eses- not too big, not small, soft cheeks, moderate, straight lips. Absolutely no exotic features in face. I feel kind of boyish in small, sharp and crisply tailored clothes. I found it makes my figure too straight and hides my figure. Some people even told me I’ve got no bust, even if I know that’s not true. I have also a delicate hourglass figure- not that full one with a prominent bust and hips, but still noticeable. One more thing- I don’t feel good with so many details- that makes me almost invisible- first you can see that details then me. I’ve checked that during measuring wedding dresses. Too many details, ornamentation and too much shine makes me invisible- I could see only a beautiful dress, not a dress making me look beautiful. Please, let me know what you think. Maybe I am a gamine and it’s just hard to accept rules for that type or maybe I’m not a gamine and that’s why it’s so difficult for me.
LikeLike
If you feel overwhelmed by details then maybe try Classic or Soft Classic.
LikeLike